Voter & Non-Electoral Participation in Houston 

Voter registration and turnout levels in the region have risen while non-electoral participation lags

The 2020 election inspired the biggest increase in voter registration and turnout in the region’s recent history, but Houston has more work to do on other measures of civic engagement. 

The data

Houston’s voter registration rate continues to grow

In the United States, citizens 18 and older can vote in an election. The U.S. Constitution grants the states the responsibility of overseeing federal and local elections. This means the way in which elections are administered differs from state to state. For example, in all but one state a person must register to vote before they are allowed to participate in an election. In Texas, voting requires registration at least 30 days prior to an upcoming election. The applicant must submit an application to the county registrar and meet several requirements in order to become a registered voter. 

The total number of registered voters in the three-county area has grown steadily over the past 12 years in parallel with the growth in the overall population. Since the 2008 presidential election, Harris County has gained over half a million registered voters. Since 2008, Fort Bend and Montgomery counties have increased their number of registered voters by 61% and 52%, respectively, compared to 27% for Harris County.

Texas saw its number of registered voters decline immediately after the 2008 presidential election, but the number of registered voters has steadily increased since 2010. As of 2020, Texas now has nearly 17 million registered voters. At the national level, the change in registered voters has fluctuated over the past 12 years. However, it reached a new high of 168 million registered voters in 2020.

Registering to vote is the first step to voting in Houston and national elections. All three counties have higher shares of eligible voters who are registered voters than both the state and the nation. Despite this strength, there is still a large number of people who are eligible to vote but who are not yet registered.

In Fort Bend, 95% of the eligible population is registered to vote, as is 93% in Montgomery. Combined, this represents approximately 50,000 people who could be registered. The Harris County voter registration rate is 88%, reflecting about 320,000 eligible voters who are not yet registered. Harris County’s voter registration rate fell from 88% in 2008 to 82% in 2014 and did not fully rebound to its 2008 level until the 2020 presidential election.

Research shows that voter registration rates vary by demographic characteristics. For example, educational attainment plays a role in the likelihood of registering to vote. In the nine-county Houston metropolitan area in 2020, citizens of voting age with lower levels of education were less likely to be registered voters than their more educated counterparts. The registration rate for residents with at least a bachelor’s degree was 25 percentage points higher than those with a high school diploma only. 

In 2020, Black citizens had the highest voter registration rate among selected racial/ethnic groups (82%). Additionally, Hispanic citizens were 13 and 22 percentage points less likely to be registered to vote than white or Black residents, respectively. Between 2016 and 2020, Black voters made the most gains in registration (11-point increase), while Hispanic registered voters increased 7 percentage points. Between 2016 and 2020, the share of citizens who registered to vote increased for all groups including Hispanics but estimates indicate their voter registration rates remain the lowest of the three racial/ethnic groups in this data set.

While not represented in the data set above, nationally, Asian Americans increased their turnout rate by more than any other racial or ethnic group between the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections, with 59% of Asian-American citizens of voting age voting. Voting rates vary depending on Asian-American ethnic group with Indians (71%), Japanese (66%), and Koreans (60%) voting at the highest rates (and much higher compared to 2016). Furthermore, naturalized citizens were more likely to register to vote than native-born citizens.

2020 election turnout sets records, still lags behind U.S. participation rates

Voting in the U.S. is not mandatory and is considered both a right and a privilege. Depending on eligibility criteria, which states determine, voting can be done in-person or by-mail and conducted early or on election day. As Houston’s population grows we expect to see more voters in our region, and voter turnout in presidential elections typically exceeds that in midterm elections. Nearly 2.3 million people in our region cast a ballot In the 2020 Presidential Election. About 72% were cast in Harris County (1.6 million), 16% in Fort Bend (357,000) and 12% in Montgomery County (271,000). 

Voter turnout rates can be measured in two ways: by the number of people who cast a ballot among those who registered to vote; and the number of people who cast a ballot among those who are of voting-age U.S. citizens. The former indicator tells us the level of participation among those who are eligible, whereas the latter tells us something about the levels of interest in the political process in a region overall.

The 2020 presidential election inspired the highest levels of voter participation in each of the three counties, as well as in Texas and the U.S., despite occurring during the COVID-19 pandemic. Voter turnout increased almost 10 percentage points in Fort Bend between 2016 and 2020, compared to a 7.8-point increase in both Harris and Montgomery counties. This high voter turnout continues the trend that started with the 2018 midterm election, in which voter turnout rose more than 20 percentage points in all three counties compared to 2014. However, our region’s presidential and midterm turnout rates continue to lag considerably compared to those of the U.S. overall.

The region and state’s lag in voter turnout does improve when comparing the citizen voting age population turnout instead of the registered voter population turnout. For example, 71% of Fort Bend’s citizen voting age population voted in the 2020 election. Montgomery saw 68% of its voting age population cast votes in 2020 as well. These turnout rates are higher than the U.S. rate of 67%. In Harris County, 59% of those eligible to vote in the 2020 election did so. In other words, over 40% of Harris County’s eligible voters didn’t participate in the most recent election. Even in Fort Bend and Montgomery counties, one in four eligible voters sat out the 2020 election. Although Houston’s voter registration rate is higher than the national average, the turnout rate still lags. 

While there are many ideas on how to improve turnout for Texas voting, including same-day voter registration and automatic registration for 18-year-olds, some political analysts believe the lack of competitive races at the higher levels of government dissuade potential voters in Texas from exercising their right to vote. Encouraging more people to run is an important aspect of the electoral system that can lead to an increase in voter participation.¹

In addition, given the racial/ethnic diversity of our region, targeted voter registration and voter turnout efforts among the Hispanic/Latino population and less educated populations are necessary to increase voter participation in the region overall. Research has shown campaign or “get out the vote” outreach efforts can promote voter turnout. Nationally, while most eligible voters reported that they received a campaign contact before the 2020 election, lower shares of Hispanic/Latino and Asian-American voters reported being contacted across various methods (e.g., mail, flyers, text message, email, phone call, home visit).

Early voting in Houston is an increasingly popular choice

One aspect of the states’ responsibility in overseeing elections is to decide if, when, and how to allow voting opportunities prior to Election Day. Research indicates early voting is an effective approach to increasing voter turnout — particularly among women and those of working age — by allowing increased time and flexibility to cast a vote.²

Early voting in Texas takes place in one of two ways: by showing up in person during the prescribed early-voting period or by voting by mail. Early voting has been a consistently popular choice with voters in the three-county area. In fact, for every November election in the past 12 years, more than 50% of the total votes were cast during the early-voting period. The 2020 election saw an even greater increase in early voting, with more than 88% of the votes in the three-county region being cast before Election Day, likely because of the pandemic and a desire to avoid crowds.

Access to early voting in Texas varies by method. Any registered voter may vote in person at early voting locations, but to vote early by mail, the registered voter must complete an application for the ballot by mail (previously referred to as “absentee voting”) if eligibility criteria are met. In Texas, voting in the 2020 election was most likely to happen in-person — 90% of early ballots were cast at early voting locations — rather than by mail. Fort Bend and Montgomery follow a similar pattern, with 91% and 90%, respectively. In Harris, in-person early voting was slightly lower at 88%.

It is not possible to compare early-voting methods across the U.S. as there are significant differences in election laws. For example, five states conduct all elections entirely by mail: Colorado, Hawaii, Oregon, Washington and Utah.

Contacting public officials is a rare occurrence in Greater Houston

The ability to contact elected officials to discuss our concerns is one of the trademark features of American democracy. However, few in our region take advantage of this right.

In 2019, 6.5% of the population in Houston (MSA) contacted a public official at least once a year. This is similar to the state rate but lower than the national rate of almost 9%. When people don’t reach out to their elected officials, not only do they lose the chance to advocate for their position, the elected official loses the ability to understand how a policy will directly affect their constituents.

Census participation is an important component of civic health

Another constitutionally designated civic activity is participation in the decennial census. Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution mandates a count of every person living in the United States. The importance of an accurate count cannot be overstated. Not only does it determine how many seats a state has in the House of Representatives, it is also used to distribute hundreds of billions of dollars in federal funds. In 2016, Texas received an estimated $44 billion from the 10 largest census-guided programs. An undercount can affect the distribution of federal money for the next 10 years. For example, according to a study by the George Washington Institute of Public Policy, a 1% undercount in Texas’s 2010 population would have cost the state almost $300 million in tax-payer dollars returned to Texas in 2015.³

Being proactive in responding to the census count ensures states continue to receive the correct amount of federal dollars for health clinics (and other similar entities within the healthcare industry), funding for school lunch programs, recovery initiatives for natural disasters in Houston and other critical programs. Households that don’t return their census forms are counted by census workers walking neighborhoods and visiting households, which increases the chance of not being counted. In fact, CUNY’s Center for Urban Research has found that low self-response rates correlate to lower census quality where people are not counted.⁴

While most states set up a statewide commission to help ensure an accurate count, Texas was one of three states that did not support this initiative. Given the lack of coordination at the state level, local governments tried to fill this role. Fort Bend created a Complete Count Committee, while Harris County and the City of Houston teamed up to create their own Complete Count Committee with a website, outreach program, and toolkit.

With those efforts, over 75% of households in Fort Bend County self-responded to the 2020 Census online, by phone, or by mail. This was a three-point increase from the 2010 Census and is above both the state and national rates. Montgomery County’s self-response rate was 67% for both the 2010 and 2020 census. Despite the outreach efforts, Harris County’s rate fell by two points from 65% in 2010 to 63% in 2020.

Continue reading about social connectedness and volunteering in Houston

Helpful Articles by Understanding Houston:

• Houston is Generous
• Houston is Engaged
• Greater Houston Area Sets Record Numbers in 2020 Voter Participation
• A Look at Electoral Participation in Houston: Past and Present
• The Importance of the Census in COVID’s America

Social Connectedness in Houston

Despite national trends, levels of trust in our community and local government are on the rise

Social connectedness and trust — foundational to a well-functioning society — are on the rise in our region, though loneliness levels remain high. 

The data

Access to civic and social organizations in Houston increases

Membership in civic and social organizations (non-profit organizations, charities, advocacy groups, meetup groups, social support groups, etc.) in our region is one of the best measures of social connectedness.¹⁴ Social connectivity is enhanced when people belong to volunteer groups or civic clubs and organizations because people who belong to such groups tend to trust others who belong to the same group.¹⁵

There are fewer organizations relative to the population in Houston’s three-county region than in Texas and the U.S. overall despite access steadily increasing in our region and declining at the state and national level. Across the three-county area, there are 3.2 civic and social organizations for every 100,000 residents, a figure that lags the state (5.2 per 100,000 residents) and nation (7.8 per 100,000 residents). 

Historically, Harris County has had the highest rate of civic and social organizations per 100,000 residents than Fort Bend and Montgomery counties, but in 2019, the rate in Montgomery County grew significantly and is now on par with Harris County. Fort Bend has the lowest rate with 2.0 civil-society organizations per 100,000 residents. 

Access to these organizations is critical, but whether we participate in them is a different measure of social connectedness.

According to data from the 2018 Houston Civic Health Index, about 35% of residents in Greater Houston say they participated in an organized group between 2013 and 2016. This is about two percentage points lower than the national average, though Greater Houston ranked 24th out of 50 large metro areas in the U.S.

Residents participated in religious organizations at a rate of 18.4%. This was followed closely by neighborhood and community groups. Greater Houston residents are comparatively more active in religious institutions and sports organizations compared to other large metros at 15th and 14th out of 50, respectively, but in each case, participation rates are less than one percentage point off from the national average.

Feelings of loneliness affect more than half of Houstonians

Social connection’s benefits are far reaching. The diversity, quality, and depth of our various social connections can protect us from feelings of isolation and loneliness. Our risk for loneliness is increased by lack of participation in social groups, among other behaviors.¹⁶ Loneliness is linked not only to mental health issues like depression and anxiety, but also physical health impacts.¹⁷ People with high rates of loneliness are more likely to experience heart disease and stroke,¹⁸ compromised immune systems,^{19, 20} and even premature death.²¹

Levels of loneliness are difficult to measure, but the industry-standard is the UCLA Loneliness Scale which uses a series of statements to calculate a loneliness score based on responses.²² As part of a national study, Cigna created a Loneliness Index based on a survey of this assessment.²³ The index stipulates that the higher the score, the lonelier people are. Possible loneliness scores range from 20 to 80.

According to the Cigna Loneliness Index, the average loneliness score for the nine-county Houston Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) ticked up slightly between 2018 and 2019, suggesting that Houstonians have not become significantly lonelier. Loneliness scores in Houston have been slightly higher than in the nation overall. 

According to the Cigna Loneliness Index and Survey, about 53% of Houstonians sometimes or always felt lonely in 2019 — about five percentage points higher than in 2018; and the share who felt they have people to talk to and are part of a group of friends declined about eight percentage points to 72% and 65%, respectively.

Nationally, the study found that younger generations are lonelier than older generations, individuals from low-income households are lonelier than their higher-income counterparts, and those living in rural areas are lonelier than those in urban and suburban communities.

Growing levels of trust in Harris County

Social trust is generally about having faith that most people in society play by the rules, the rules are fair and the same for everyone, and everyone has a fair shot to pursue the life they want. Established research has found that corruption,²⁴ segregation,²⁵ and economic inequality²⁶ are the factors most closely linked to distrust, meaning as levels of corruption, segregation, and inequality fall, social trust will increase. More recently, research is emerging that suggests social trust is increasingly influenced by the degree of political polarization within a community.²⁷

Countries that have high levels of social and government trust tend to have stronger democracies,²⁸ richer economies,²⁹ and better health.³⁰ Neighborhoods that have high levels of social trust are more likely to work together on important projects to improve their community.³¹ However, the percentage of residents in the greater Houston area who report working with their neighbors to improve something in the neighborhood in 2018 (latest available) was 2.5 percentage points below the national average.³²

The 2020 Kinder Houston Area Survey (KHAS) asked residents of Harris County whether most people can be trusted or whether you can’t be too careful with people, and 46% believe they can trust most of their neighbors. 

While 2020 data for Fort Bend and Montgomery counties aren’t available, historical data shows that levels of trust were on the rise after a dip in 2015. Between 2015 and 2018, residents’ level of trust has increased from 32% to 43% across the three-county area. Levels of trust in the U.S. overall appear to be higher than levels in our region. The Pew Research Center reported that 52% of Americans in 2018 believe that most people can be trusted — nine percentage points higher than in the Houston area. Levels of trust in 2018 were highest in Fort Bend County, which is also among the most racially/ethnically diverse in the nation.

Levels of trust differ by demographic characteristics. Asian American and white respondents who live in Harris County reported the highest levels of trust in the 2020 KHAS, whereas Black and Hispanic residents reported the lowest trust levels. Disparities in levels of trust by race/ethnicity — also evident in the 2018 survey and consistent with national trends — signal that more can be done to facilitate connectedness within and among our diverse communities. The low levels of trust by Black and Hispanic residents may be explained by historic and contemporary discrimination suffered by those groups.³³ Black and Hispanic residents in Houston’s three-county region are more likely to live in low-income communities that tend to be less trusting as these neighborhoods have historically been marginalized and received limited public investment for community and economic development.³⁴

Just over half of residents trust their local government

Social capital has been shown to influence the extent to which residents trust their government.³⁵ When residents trust their governments to do the right thing and work in the best interest of our communities, they are more likely to comply with rules and policies, particularly during natural disasters or times of crisis.³⁶

When asked whether their local government can be trusted to do what’s best for the community, Harris County residents responded mostly positively (56%) in 2019, a marginal increase since 2014. At the national level, public trust in the federal government remains low with only 17% of Americans who said they trust the government in Washington in 2019 to do what is right (in 2020, that rate jumped to 24%).

Historical data on the three-county region shows that the majority of residents in Harris and Fort Bend counties believed in 2014 that local government can be trusted to do what’s best. Montgomery County reported less trust with only 48.8% of residents responding they believe in local government to do what is best for the community.

Helpful Articles by Understanding Houston:

• Houston is Engaged
• Key Insights From Our Mental Health Data Dive + Workshop
• Houston is Resilient
• How Community Gardens Fight Against Food Insecurity in Greater Houston
• Three Facts About Natural Disasters in Houston

Philanthropy and Volunteering in Houston

Volunteer activity and financial donations are a force of good throughout our region

Nonprofits in Houston’s three-county region advance civic engagement not only by improving the condition of our residents and their communities but also through the strengthening of social ties among those who actively participate.

The data

Almost half of residents donate $25 or more to nonprofits

When people feel connected to their community, they take action to protect and improve it.³ They work to better the condition of their neighbors. One way to do that is through donations to nonprofit organizations. According to the GivingUSA 2021 Report, Americans gave $471.4 billion in 2020. Individuals gave the most ($324 billion), followed by foundations ($89 billion). The region’s giving spirit has supported recovery efforts after multiple natural disasters in Houston, but on average, about half of residents give $25 or more to nonprofit organizations.

In the greater Houston region, nearly half of residents (48.8%) said they donated at least $25 to a charitable organization(s) in 2019. This is similar to the national average (50.5%) and slightly higher than the Texas state average (45.3%). When looking at other large metropolitan areas, Greater Houston is in the middle of the pack when it comes to charitable giving. A larger share of Houstonians donated to nonprofits compared to metropolitan areas such as Los Angeles, New York and San Antonio, but Houston lagged in giving rates compared to regions like Austin, Atlanta and Chicago.

Residents of Houston’s three-county region have given an average of $4.4 billion a year to charitable organizations between 2011 and 2018. This is about roughly one-fourth of the donations made by Texans. Charitable giving tends to increase in times of disaster.⁴ Consequently, charities in Houston topped the list for the highest total contributions out of 30 major metros in 2017. 

Most recently, reported giving levels have fluctuated widely, and are $3.6 billion in the 2018 tax year — down 37% from $5.7 billion in the year before. This decline can be attributed, in part, to a change in federal legislation that year that increased the standard deduction for charitable donations — total itemized deductions, as of 2018, must exceed $12,000 for individuals (up from $6,350 in 2017) and $24,000 for married couples (up from $12,700 in 2017). This change likely resulted in significant declines in the number of individuals who claimed contributions on their tax returns, and the overall amount — a trend seen nationally as well.

Households with higher incomes are more likely to make charitable contributions than their lower-income neighbors. Yet, fewer than half of households that earn more than $200,000 annually in Houston’s three-county region claimed charitable contributions in 2018. 

While the aforementioned 2017 tax law decreased the total number of people who itemized, top earners still had an incentive to itemize. This could help explain why top earners have such a higher share of filers with charitable givings itemized.

Not surprisingly, reported levels of giving vary greatly by household income, with higher-income households donating more money than low-income households. But, giving also varies across the region. Households that earn $200,000 or more in Fort Bend County gave an average of $20,000 in the 2018 tax year. This is nearly half the average in Harris County ($38,661) and slightly lower than the average in Montgomery County ($24,301).

While the aforementioned 2017 tax law decreased the total number of people who itemized, top earners still had an incentive to itemize. This could help explain why top earners have such a higher share of filers with charitable givings itemized and the amount they gave.

Nonprofits in Houston are robust and provide critical services

Nonprofit organizations provide a variety of critical services, and therefore include a multitude of different types of organizations — private hospitals in the healthcare industry, chambers of commerce, private universities or organizations focusing on funding for schools, philanthropic foundations, and established charitable organizations who provide services to people and animals. Public charities in particular tend to play a vital role in strengthening communities as they have strong relationships with the people they serve — typically low-income and other historically marginalized communities — and possess unique understanding and knowledge of their community and their needs,⁵ particularly when the organization is led and staffed by people who share similar experiences with those they serve.

How many nonprofits are in Houston? Across the three-county area, there are a total of 15,660 nonprofit public charities — classified under section 501(c)(3) organizations by the IRS. The vast majority (12,509) are located in Harris County, with far fewer in Fort Bend (1,788) and Montgomery (1,363) counties. Religion-related organizations comprise the majority of nonprofits in Houston, followed by human services organizations that provide a broad range of social services. Overall, the three-county region has a higher share of religious nonprofit organizations and a smaller proportion of human services organizations compared to the state and nation.

Houston’s three county region has a reputation for being home to a large number of charitable organizations that provide important services to residents in need. However, the number of public charities per 10,000 residents is lower in each of our region’s three counties when compared to the state and national rates. This disparity may suggest that nonprofits in Houston are overwhelmed with demand, particularly when they are needed most — during times of crisis.

COVID-19 disrupts steady rates of volunteering in Houston

The act of volunteering one’s time to better their community is a key behavior of civic engagement. Volunteering strengthens community ties and can spur additional forms of civic engagement such as advocating for public policy change or by inspiring Houston voters to get out and vote. Taking advantage of volunteer opportunities is not only important to organizations and communities, but also has a number of benefits for the volunteer. Volunteering can increase overall mental and physical health and have a positive effect on psychological well-being when done consistently and regularly.⁶

Between 2012 and 2020, at least 50% of residents in the three-county area had volunteered at least once in the last 12 months, according to the Kinder Houston Area Survey. However, between 2020 and 2021 the proportion of Harris County residents who volunteer fell 14 percentage points to 39.5%. This decline in volunteer rates is consistent with national trends as well. A study conducted by Fidelity found that two-in-three Americans surveyed either reduced or stopped previous volunteer activity due to the COVID-19 pandemic.⁷

Among those who volunteered in 2019, residents of the Houston metropolitan area volunteered at slightly lower rates than in Texas the U.S. overall. Of those who did participate in volunteering opportunities in Houston, over 60% do so at least once a month compared to roughly 70% for the state and the nation.

Continue reading about civic engagement in Houston

Helpful Articles by Understanding Houston:

• Houston is Generous
• Houston is Engaged
• Greater Houston Area Sets Record Numbers in 2020 Voter Participation
• A Look at Electoral Participation in Houston: Past and Present
• The Importance of the Census in COVID’s America

Small Business in Houston

As significant contributors to our regional economy, small businesses provide income and wealth-generating opportunities for residents

Despite the pandemic’s immediate effect on the economy, small business growth in Houston’s three-county region remains strong. Yet, disparities persist for women and others who come from historically marginalized backgrounds.

The data

Small business growth in Fort Bend and Montgomery counties outpaces Harris County

While the definition of small businesses can vary depending on industry, employee count, level of revenue, the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA), defines a small business as one that is independently owned and operated, exerts little influence in its industry, and (with some exceptions) has fewer than 500 employees. According to the SBA, small businesses of 500 employees or fewer make up 99.9% of all U.S. businesses and created 17.3 million net new jobs between 1995 and 2021, accounting for nearly two-thirds of new net jobs created. A 2019 SBA report found that small businesses accounted for 44% of U.S. GDP.

Because nearly all businesses employ fewer than 500 people, and our geographic scope is regional, Understanding Houston focuses its analysis on businesses that employ between 1 and 9 people, inclusive. In 2022, there were nearly 14,000 small businesses (with fewer than 10 paid employees) in Fort Bend, 77,900 in Harris, and 10,700 in Montgomery counties. Between 2010 and 2022, the number of small businesses grew 101% in Fort Bend County, 22% in Harris County, 62% in Montgomery County, 27% in Texas overall, and 12% nationally.

At 78.9%, Fort Bend County had the highest percentage of businesses with fewer than 10 employees in Houston’s three-county region in 2022 — nearly four percentage points higher than in 2010. In Montgomery County, 73.4% of businesses employed fewer than 10 people. In comparison, Harris County (70.9%) had the lowest proportion of businesses with fewer than 10 employees in the area, which is slightly lower than the state and U.S. level.

Women-owned businesses in Houston decreased

Not only do small businesses create jobs and add to the economy, they provide wealth-building opportunities for and contribute to growth and vitality in local communities. In particular, creation of small businesses by immigrants, people of color, and women — sometimes a necessity to overcome employment barriers, challenges in building personal wealth, and discrimination — can help increase economic opportunity — a cornerstone of the American Dream. A 2022 study found that immigrants are about 80 percent more likely to found a business, compared to native-born citizens. Immigrant-owned firms also have about 1 percent more employees than those founded by U.S. natives, on average.³

Overall, the percentage of businesses with fewer than 10 paid employees are more likely to be owned by people of color (defined as anyone who does not identify as non-Hispanic white) in the nine-county Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land Metropolitan Statistical Area (Houston MSA) than in Texas and the U.S. overall. 

In the Houston MSA, 38.5% of small businesses are owned solely by people of color, compared to 32.4% in Texas and 21.0% across the nation. In particular, Asian Americans are overrepresented among business owners — they own 22.2% of small businesses in the region, but comprise 8% of the MSA’s population. Additionally, the Houston MSA has a higher rate of Asian-American-owned small businesses than Texas (14.5%) and the U.S. (11.6%). The percentage of Hispanic-owned businesses was also much higher in the Houston MSA (11.2%) than the U.S. (7.3%), but slightly lower than in Texas (14.5%). More small businesses in Houston are also Black owned at 4.7% compared to Texas (3.0%) and the U.S. (2.8%).

In 2020, small businesses in the Houston MSA were slightly more likely to be owned by women compared to the state and the nation. In the Houston MSA in 2020, 24.6% of small businesses were owned solely by women compared to about 22% in Texas and the U.S. However, between 2020 and 2021, the percentage of women-owned small businesses in Houston decreased 8 percentage points from 25% in 2020 to 17% in 2021.

More Houstonians work for themselves

Nonemployer businesses have no paid employees, annual business receipts of $1,000 or more, and are subject to federal income taxes. Most nonemployers are self-employed individuals (e.g., real estate agents, independent contractors) operating unincorporated businesses (known as sole proprietorships), which may or may not be the owner’s principal source of income. According to the Census Bureau, the majority of all business establishments in the United States are nonemployers, yet these firms average less than 4 percent of all sales and receipts nationally.

The number of nonemployer businesses in Fort Bend County increased 96% to 101,570 in 2021 from 2010 — the most rapid growth rate in Houston’s three-county region. In Montgomery County, nonemployer businesses grew 78% to 67,438in 2021 from 2010. Growth in Harris County (49%) was similar to Texas (48%); and the state and region outpaced the national growth rate (29%).

The over 680,000 nonemployer businesses in Houston’s three-county region generated nearly $36 billion dollars in revenue in 2021 — this is a 75% increase from 2010 — with the greatest growth in Fort Bend and Montgomery counties.

Helpful Articles by Understanding Houston:

• Houston is Entrepreneurial
• The Great She-cession: How COVID-19 is impacting women in the workforce
• COVID-19 Recovery and the Ongoing Challenges Facing Houston Entrepreneurs

Access to Credit and Household Debt

Good financial health is essential to economic security and upward mobility

Houston-area residents are more likely to be banked, have better credit access and quality, and be current on debt obligations than in the past. However, despite this improvement, the Houston region continues to lag behind the nation in key indicators of financial health, placing our most economically vulnerable residents at risk of financial exploitation.

The data

Unbanked households in Houston are rising after years of decline

Accessing credit through the “official” credit economy (e.g., banks or credit unions), is optimal over utilizing non-traditional sources (e.g., check-cashing services, pawn shop loans, auto title loans, and paycheck advances/ payday loans), because it allows the credit holder expanded choices with greater flexibility, provides more favorable rates and fee levels, and can offer future rewards and benefits. However, people generally pursue these non-traditional routes because they have been denied access to traditional banking services.

Unbanked residents are those who rely on non-bank financial services such as check-cashing services, money orders, pawn shop loans, auto title loans, paycheck advances or payday loans to manage their finances. The unbanked are more likely to be younger, have lower incomes, less education, a disability, and identify as a person of color.¹  Being unbanked also poses financial disadvantages. For example, you cannot access any systems that require a bank account to activate, such as direct deposit from an employer.

Underbanked households have a checking or savings account with a bank or credit union but also use alternative financial services (e.g., check-cashing services, money orders, international remittances, pawn shop loans, auto title loans, paycheck advances or payday loans) to manage their finances.

Households in the nine-county Houston Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) are more likely to be unbanked than the overall rate in Texas and the U.S. About 1 out of 11 Houston-area households are unbanked compared to 1 out of 15 in Texas and 1 out of 25 nationally. An additional 17% in the Houston Metro Area are underbanked, meaning one out of four households in the region uses non-traditional financial services, putting them at risk of exploitation and predatory financing. About three-quarters of Houston-area households are fully banked.

Between 2017 and 2021, the percentage of unbanked households declined across the nation, state, and Houston metro. However, as of 2023, this rate has increased in Houston and across Texas. The Houston metro area’s share of unbanked households is more than twice that of the nation and slightly above Texas.

There are significant racial/ethnic differences among the fully banked. Black and Latino households are much less likely to be fully banked and more likely to use non-traditional/alternative financial services than their white counterparts for three significant reasons: discrimination, income disparities, and access levels. 

Black and Latino families have experienced explicit exclusionary practices within the financial system, such as redlining, and continue to experience more implicit forms today. Consequently, these discriminatory and harmful practices have contributed to a legacy of mistrust in the mainstream financial system among many people from historically marginalized communities. Many traditional banks typically require account holders to maintain a minimum balance, but if that threshold is not met, they generally charge additional fees and penalties, and, ultimately, may close or deny future accounts altogether. Black and Latino families have lower access to traditional banks and more access to alternative financial institutions. Not only are there fewer bank branches in predominantly Black and Latino neighborhoods, but also there is a saturation of payday loan stores and check cashing outlets.³

About 16% of Hispanic households in the Houston metro area are unbanked, compared to about 4% of white households. As with unbanked households, there are significant differences in underbanked households by the race and ethnicity of the household. For example, about 1 in 5 Hispanic households in the Houston metro area are underbanked, compared to about 1 in 10 white households that are underbanked.

Availability of credit in the Houston region improves, surpassing the state and nearing the national average.

Consumer spending patterns are closely linked to consumer confidence and overall economic health. Because credit drives and enables spending, access to credit tells us a lot about the overall economic well-being of our region and can be measured by the percentage of the population 15 years and older who utilize mainstream credit.

Mainstream credit refers to the full range of credit products that are typically reported to the nationwide credit reporting agencies that form the basis of your credit history and influence your credit score. A credit score is a numerical representation of an individual’s creditworthiness, which is used by lenders, creditors, and other financial institutions to evaluate the risk associated with extending credit or lending money. Credit scores are primarily based on an individual’s credit history, which includes factors such as payment history, amounts owed, length of credit history, types of credit, and recent credit inquiries.

In 2023, about 82% of adults in the Houston Metro Area used mainstream credit in the past 12 months performing about on par with the state of Texas for this indicator and slightly below the national average.

Having a credit file and credit score does not ensure timely access to credit. Revolving credit provides immediate credit at the credit-holder’s discretion. These lines of credit are called revolving credit because once made available, the credit is used, then paid for, and finally made available once again in a revolving cycle.⁴ Most people who participate in the credit economy have revolving credit in the form of a credit card or a home equity line of credit.

The percentage of adults who used revolving credit — in the form of a credit card — has increased by 10 percentage points in Texas and across the country since 2015. The Houston Metro Area saw this rate increase 17 points, and as of 2023 outperforms the state and is nearly on par with the nation overall. As of 2023, about three quarters of Houston metro residents have access to revolving credit in the form of a credit card.

Despite improvement, about a quarter of residents have a low credit score

Accessing credit through the “official” credit economy (traditional pathways such as banks or credit unions), is optimal over utilizing non-traditional sources (e.g., check-cashing services, pawn shop loans, auto title loans, and paycheck advances/ payday loans), because it allows the credit holder expanded choices with greater flexibility, provides more favorable rates and fee levels, and can offer future rewards and benefits.

However, people generally pursue these non-traditional routes because they have been denied access to the traditional/official credit economy, meaning these individuals are denied loans from traditional banks, are not issued credit cards, or don’t have valuable collateral to exchange. This leaves about 25% of our region with limited options while in a desperate situation. Not surprisingly, their vulnerability places them at greater risk of exploitation in the form of sky-high interest rates, exorbitant fees, and makes them more likely to need these services again.

Strong credit quality helps a family’s financial standing and positively impacts access to future credit that can allow a family to invest in wealth-building assets such as buying a home or building a business. Credit quality is determined by credit history and is measured by the percentage of individuals in the credit economy who have reliable payment history — meaning, they are consistently current on all financial obligations.

Falling behind on bill payments is a potential indicator of creditworthiness, providing insights into a household’s ability to satisfy its financial obligations and access different forms of credit. Across the Houston Metro Area, residents are about as likely to be current on all financial obligations as the average American with 87% of residents not falling behind on bill payments. Conversely, 13% of Houston area residents did fall behind on bill payments in 2023.

When debts are not paid on time, the credit holder’s credit score is lowered, which results in a reduction in access to future credit. Credit scores are used to evaluate the risk associated with extending credit or lending money, and they are based on an individual’s credit history, which includes factors such as payment history, amounts owed, length of credit history, types of credit, and recent credit inquiries. 

Credit scores range from 300 to 850, with higher scores indicating “better creditworthiness.” A good credit score can help individuals secure better interest rates on loans, credit cards, and mortgages, as well as make it easier to rent an apartment or obtain certain types of employment.

Conversely, a low credit score can make it more difficult to obtain credit or result in higher interest rates, making borrowing more expensive. Individuals with a credit score below 660 are considered to have subprime credit. People who have subprime credit scores have limited options to access credit. The type of credit available to them is often high-risk because it comes with higher interest rates and exploitive repayment plans that can often trap individuals in a cycle of debt. Measuring the percentage of people with subprime credit has been used as an indicator of the health of Houston-area residents’ ability to access credit.

In 2023, Harris County had a higher rate of residents with a subprime credit score (i.e., below 660), with nearly 1 in 3, compared to Fort Bend and Montgomery counties where 1 in 4 residents had subprime credit scores. Fortunately, across all three counties the rate of residents with a subprime credit score has decreased by 5-6 percentage points since 2015 but have stagnated since 2021.

Medical debt in collections falls while student debt in default rises

Once we gain access to credit, we then hold a debt for that amount plus interest and any fees. Having debt is not necessarily a bad thing. Incurring debt can allow us to invest in something that has the potential to pay off later, build a positive credit history, give tax benefits, and more. Being in debt to buy a home, start a business, and pay for high-quality education or in-demand skills training have been identified as good investments that can increase one’s economic security and opportunity, including accumulating wealth.

However, unproductive debt is debt incurred to pay for basic needs and living expenses. We are more likely to accumulate unproductive debt during an unforeseen job loss or medical crisis, or because our current resources do not cover our expenses. Because it does not have the same long-term benefits, unproductive debt is riskier for the debt holder and society at large.⁵

An overreliance and dependence on credit can lead to the accumulation of unhealthy debt levels, which reduces the ability to make on-time full payments. When residents can’t meet payment obligations, they face additional fees and penalties, higher interest rates, lower credit scores, the potential loss of property such as vehicles and homes, and/or debt can go into collections. Debt goes into collections when the original creditor cannot collect payment on the debt, so they either sell or transfer the debt to a collections agency that tries to recover the money. Consequently, it becomes harder and more expensive to access credit.

Total Debt

The percentage of individuals in the credit economy with debt in collections has consistently been much higher at the state (Texas) level, since 2017, compared to the national level. About 32% of Texans have debt in collections compared to 22% among all Americans. Texas — along with Louisiana, South Carolina, and Georgia — has the highest percentage of people with debt in collections in the nation. This finding is even more striking since Texas is the second-most populous state.

In Harris County, 34% of residents have debt in collections, the highest level in Houston’s three-county region. About 22% of people in Fort Bend County and 25% in Montgomery County also have debt in collections, which is closer to the national level.

The percentage of individuals in the credit economy with debt in collections has declined nationally and in Texas since 2017. Between 2017 and 2023, the percentage of debt in collections fell seven percentage points in Fort Bend, nine points in Montgomery County, and ten percentage points in Harris County.

This decrease may be due to a combination of (1) the National Consumer Assistance Plan (NCAP) that was fully implemented in 2018 which changed reporting requirements and resulted in 8 million people having collections accounts removed from their credit report⁶; and (2) federal government action like mortgage and student loan forbearance implemented to mitigate the effects of the pandemic.⁷ In Texas specifically, the winter storm of 2021 also resulted in a large increase in mortgage forbearance in the state.⁸

Medical Debt

Medical debt refers to the share of people with a credit bureau record who have medical debt in collections. Texas has more people with medical debt in collections (9%) than the national rate (5%). Harris Montgomery counties have the highest share of debt holders with outstanding medical debt in the region (6%).

Texas saw a 17-percentage-point decrease in medical debt in collections between 2017 (26%) and 2023 (9%) but still remains slightly higher than the national average of 5%. Harris and Montgomery counties both saw a decrease of 12 and 13 percentage points, respectively, and both counties remain in line with the national percentage (5%).

The national decline in medical debt in collections is partially due to reforms in credit reporting practices. In 2022, credit-reporting companies removed medical debts in collections (that were eventually paid) from credit reports and extended the grace period for reporting unpaid medical debts from six months to one year. In 2023, medical debts in collection under $500 were excluded from credit reports entirely. It is estimated that within one year of these changes, more than 15 million Americans had their medical debt in collections erased from their credit reports and, as a result, roughly 27 million adults were able to increase their credit score from subprime (below 660) to near prime (between 601 and 660).⁵

Student Loan Debt

Student loan debt refers to the share of people with any student loan debt who are in default/debt in collections. While total and medical debt in collections have shown a decline, the past year has seen an increase in the rate of residents who have student loan debt in collections. About 15% of people in Texas and the nation are in this position, which is on par with regional rates.

Between 2017 and 2022, the percentage of student loan borrowers in default declined with Fort Bend County experiencing the largest reduction at 10-percentage points. However, rates of student loan defaults have increased, reversing past progress. As of 2023, Fort Bend County had the highest student loan default in the region at 17%.

The general downward trend in student loan defaults is largely due to the student debt loan relief implemented during the pandemic and extended through mid-2023.¹⁰ On March 13, 2020, the federal government granted forbearance on student loan payments toward eligible loans. Forbearance allows borrowers to pause or reduce debt payments during periods of hardship, without showing the loan delinquent on the credit report.¹¹

Debt in Collections by Race/Ethnicity

As described in the Unbanked/Underbanked section above, the ability to access credit has historically been more fraught for people from historically marginalized communities, particularly for Black and Latino households. Because finance policies disproportionately harmed some groups while simultaneously benefiting others, disaggregating this indicator by race and ethnicity is helpful. Additionally, debt can often burden family and community well-being and reinforce the wealth gap between white and non-white communities of color.⁶

In each geography, ZIP Codes where at least 50% of the population identifies as Black, Indigenous, Asian, Hispanic, or another non-white group are much more likely to have debt in collections than white communities (where at least 50% of residents are white). 

Across the nation in 2023, 29% of communities of color had debt in collections, compared with 19% of white communities. More than a third of the people who live in communities of color within Texas, Harris County, and Montgomery County have debt in collections. In 2023, the percentage of debt in collections for communities of color compared to white communities was 19 percentage points higher in Harris County, 13 points higher in Montgomery County, 6 points higher in Fort Bend County, 12 points higher at the state level, and 10 points higher at the national level.

More Helpful Articles by Understanding Houston:

• COVID-19 Recovery and the Ongoing Challenges Facing Houston Entrepreneurs
• Houston is Entrepreneurial
• The Great She-cession: How COVID-19 is impacting women in the workforce

Poverty and Economic Mobility in Houston

Too many Houston-area families are stuck in the cycle of intergenerational poverty, preventing economic mobility

Despite a slight decline in poverty rates over the last decade, over one million households in Houston’s three-county region struggle to afford basic necessities.

The data

Despite declining poverty rates since 2010, 54,000 more Houstonians live in poverty

The Official Poverty Measure was developed in the mid-1960s by Mollie Orshansky, an economist at the Social Security Administration, to measure the Lyndon B. Johnson Administration’s success in its “War on Poverty.” Her formula was derived from the cost of a minimum food diet for different family sizes, which she believed accounted for a third of a family’s overall budget. Orshansky concluded, if a family earned less than three times the cost of food, then they lived below the poverty threshold. Today’s measure is still based on this original calculation and is updated annually for inflation. 

This measure, while consistent over decades, has limitations: It does not account for geographic cost-of-living differences — the threshold is the same regardless of where one lives in the continental United States; supplemental income such as tax credits, housing vouchers, or Medicare is not considered part of income; and the definition of a “family” is narrowly defined.¹⁶ According to the U.S. Census Bureau, “The official poverty measure is based on pretax cash income, while the Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM) includes noncash benefits such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and housing subsidies as well as net income after payroll taxes, tax credits and other necessary expenses.” 

In 2023, the Federal Poverty Line, or poverty threshold, was $15,060 for an individual and $31,200 for a family of four. Based on this definition, 40.8 million Americans lived below the poverty level. Comprising 13% of the population, 1 out of 8 Americans live in poverty, according to the official measure.

In 2023, the poverty rate was 9% in Fort Bend, 16% in Harris, and 11% in Montgomery County. In Houston’s three-county region, the poverty rate is consistently lowest in Fort Bend County and highest in Harris County. Nearly 924,000 Houston-area residents lived below the poverty line in 2023.

Over the last decade, poverty rates in each Houston-area county steadily declined from 2010 to a decade-low in 2019, before ticking back up in 2021. Between 2010 and 2019, the share of people living below the poverty line fell by 2.8 percentage points in Fort Bend, 3.6 points in Harris, and 2.6 points in Montgomery counties. Between 2021 and 2023, poverty rates remained flat in Harris County, fluctuated in Montgomery County but ultimately ticked down by nearly one point, and increased 2.1 percentage points in Fort Bend County.

While the percentage of Houston-area residents who live in poverty is lower in 2023 than in 2010, the number of people living in poverty has increased during this period. As of 2023, the number of people living in poverty was 81,000 in Fort Bend County, 767,000 in Harris County, and 76,000 in Montgomery County.

Racial characteristics of poverty in Houston’s three county region

In the United States, poverty and race are strongly connected,¹⁷ with poverty rates generally highest among the Black population and lowest among the white population (among the four largest racial/ethnic groups). That this disparity exists in nearly every state and county in the nation, suggests that this lack of equality can be attributed more to the institutional disadvantages and discrimination that has been embedded into the various systems that guide American life — education, healthcare, housing, employment — than to individual characteristics.¹⁸

Exacerbating racial/ethnic disparities, Black families are 16 times more likely to have lived in poverty for at least three generations compared to white families, according to an analysis from Brookings Institution. One in five Black Americans (21.3%) are experiencing poverty for the third consecutive generation, compared to one in a hundred white Americans (1.2%).

A 2024 Opportunity Insights paper reveals that while significant racial disparities do still exist, the national Black-white mobility gap has shrunk by nearly 30% in the past 15 years. Comparing two birth cohorts, people born in 1978 and 1992, this study found that Black children born to low-income (25^th percentile) parents in 1992 earned more as adults than those born in 1978. Meanwhile, white children from similar backgrounds saw a decline in earnings across cohorts. However, disparities remain. On average, the earnings gap between Black and white adults who grew up in low-income families is $13,000. We see a similar trend in median household income by race and ethnicity regionally and for the state and nation where racial disparities in income do still exist but these gaps have narrowed between 2010 and 2023.

Read more about race and economic mobility.

In 2023, 9.4% of white Americans nationwide lived in poverty, while the figures were 20.8% for the Black population, 16.7% for the Hispanic population, and 9.9% for Asian Americans. Poverty rates in Harris County and Texas closely mirror these national statistics.

In Fort Bend and Montgomery counties, the poverty rate is highest among the Hispanic population at 12.4% and 17.0% respectively. In Harris County, Black residents experience the highest poverty rate (21.2%), which is more than triple the rate for white residents (6.9%), followed closely by Hispanics (20.6%).

In Montgomery County, the proportion of the Hispanic population living below the poverty threshold fell by 8.7 percentage points between 2010 and 2023 — the greatest decline among racial/ethnic groups in the county—followed by a 5.3-percentage-point decline for the Black population in Montgomery County. In Harris County, Hispanic residents experienced the greatest declines in poverty rates (5.8 percentage points), followed by Asian Americans (5.5-percentage-point decline). In Fort Bend County, the poverty rate fell by 3.5 percentage points among Black residents and 3.1 for Hispanic residents compared to a 3.9-percentage-point increase for Asian American residents in Fort Bend County. Across all three counties between 2010 and 2023, the poverty rate for white residents was stagnant.

Single-parent families and poverty in Houston’s three-county region

Across the United States, the percent of families led by single parents declined from around 15% in 2010 to 13% in 2023. Locally, the share of families led by single parents in 2023 was 9% in Fort Bend County, 16% in Harris County, and 11% in Montgomery County. However, despite the declining rates, the number of single-parent led families in Houston’s three-county area has increased in the last decade because of the area’s growing population. The increase in this family structure is a concern because families led by single parents are five times more likely to live below the poverty threshold than two-parent-households. Among single-parent families in the United States, 70% are headed by women; and nearly 1 in 3 (32.2%) households led by single-moms lives in poverty compared to 1 in 18 (5.7%) households led by married couples.

In Harris County, 37% of single-mom families with children under 18 live in poverty — nearly 4 times the rate of married-couple families but a 5-percentage-point decreased compared to over a decade ago. In Montgomery County, the rate of single-mom families with children living in poverty is roughly five times that of married-couple families and has experienced a smaller decrease of 2 percentage points. We see the same gap in Fort Bend County between single-mom and married-couple families but the rate of single-mom families with children living in poverty has not improved over time although it is the lowest in the Houston three-county region.

Nearly one out of four children in Harris County lives in poverty

Research has shown that children growing up in poverty are more likely to face chronic stress and conditions that leave permanent changes in their brains, with implications for learning, health and behavior.¹⁹ Children who have lived many years in poverty are 90% more likely than their peers who never lived in poverty to enter their 20s without completing high school and, for girls, are four times more likely to become a teen mother setting the stage for the intergenerational transmission of disadvantage and onset of chronic poverty.²⁰

Poverty rates for children are typically higher than for adults. The proportion of children under 18 living in poverty in 2023 was 10.4% in Fort Bend, 23% in Harris, and 15% in Montgomery County. Fort Bend and Montgomery counties have lower rates of children living in poverty compared to the state (18.4%) and the nation (16%) while Harris County has a higher rate.

Between 2010 and 2023, poverty rates for children under 18 have declined more than 5 percentage points across the nation, with the greatest declines occurring between 2010 and 2019. Between 2019 and 2021, poverty rates ticked back up in each county, the state, and nation — and in the case of Montgomery County, reversed all gains from the previous decade. As of 2023, the poverty rate in all three counties remains higher than it was in 2019.

Poverty rates for children 5 and under are even higher than they are for all children although this difference has decreased over the years. The proportion of children 5 and under living in poverty in 2023 was 10.5% in Fort Bend, 23.7% in Harris, and 15.1% in Montgomery County. Poverty trends for children 5 and under steadily declined between 2010 and 2019, but then ticked up during the pandemic, according to 2021 data. Between 2010 and 2023, poverty rates for children 5 and under decreased more across the state (-9.4 percentage points) and the nation (-8 points) compared to a decrease of 4.5 points in Fort Bend, 6.6 points in Harris, and 7.7 points in Montgomery counties.

In 2023, 10.0% of white children under 18 were experiencing poverty across the nation, compared to 29.3% of Black children, 21.6% of Hispanic children and 10.0% of Asian American children. The poverty rate for non-white children under 18, and children overall, in Harris County exceeds both national and state levels, while the rate of white children experiencing poverty in Harris County is lower.

Number of youths aged 16 to 19 neither working nor pursuing education decreases in Montgomery County and across the U.S.

Young people between the ages of 16 and 24 who are not enrolled in school or not working are classified as “opportunity youth.” Once a young person becomes disengaged from school or work, it becomes increasingly difficult to reconnect them to opportunities in education and skill development.²¹ Being disconnected is both a consequence and a cause of poverty, and opportunity youth are twice as likely to live in poverty as their connected peers and are less likely to be employed, own a home, or report good health when they reach their thirties.²²

Approximately 8% of the 16-to-19-year-old population are neither working nor attending school in Texas, a higher share compared to the national average (6.9%). Fort Bend and Montgomery counties have the lowest rate of 16-to-19-year-olds considered opportunity youth at 5.8% and 5.1% respectively compared to 8.7% in Harris County. Between 2010 and 2022, the proportion of youth neither in school nor working decreased the most in Montgomery County by 3.1 percentage points. However, the number of opportunity youth increased in Fort Bend and Harris counties by 32% and 2% respectively while the number decreased by 9% in Montgomery County. This is compared to a 4% increased in the number of opportunity youth across the state and a 17% decrease across the nation.

One out of three Houston-area households experience ALICE

Because the Official Poverty Measure has such a low financial threshold, it is not a strong indicator to assess a population’s overall level of economic security. Although many believe that having a full-time job with a steady income allows someone to overcome poverty, the reality is that many full-time workers struggle to make ends meet. Indicators that take into consideration more realistic costs of living show that many working families are struggling. 

The acronym ALICE stands for Asset Limited, Income Constrained, and Employed. It represents families that are working but unable to afford all their basic necessities like housing, food, childcare, health care and transportation. ALICE income thresholds include a more realistic cost of living than federal poverty guidelines.

To put things in perspective, the Texas cost-of-living in 2022 was $72,816 for a family of four and $26,268 for a single adult, which are both significantly higher than the Federal Poverty Level of $29,950 for a family of four and $14,880 for a single adult in 2022. ALICE income thresholds across all three counties indicate that a more realistic “survival budget” for a family of four is at least $78,012. With Harris County’s median household income below this threshold, it is no surprise we see higher portions of ALICE households in Harris County than in either Montgomery or Fort Bend counties.

Nearly one in three Houston-area households were classified as ALICE (Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed) in 2022, which is slightly higher than the state (29%) and national rate (29%). The proportion of households classified as ALICE was 27% in Fort Bend, 32% in Harris, and 27% in Montgomery counties. This is on top of the percentage of households that live below the Federal Poverty Line.

Over one million households (44%) in Houston’s three-county region either live below the poverty threshold or experience ALICE. While the number of households in poverty increased between 2010 and 2022 in the three-county region by 24%, the number of ALICE households increased at a much faster rate during the same period by 49% primarily as a result of rising costs and stagnant wages.

Economic mobility in the Houston area

Economic mobility, or intergenerational mobility, measures the percentage of children who grow up to earn more than their parents. To a great extent, it is a central component of the “American Dream.” It reflects the aspiration that through hard work and determination anyone can achieve their highest goals and fullest potential.

Per Opportunity Insights, a Harvard-based research nonprofit that conducts scientific research on how to improve upward mobility, more than 90% of children born nationally in the 1940s grew up to earn more than their parents. But over the past 50 years, this rate has been in decline, and is now only 50%, contributing to growing income inequality across the country. Research from Opportunity Insights shows upward economic mobility largely depends upon where one lives during childhood and the type of resources their family possesses. Children raised in low-income families have a much harder time securing higher incomes in adulthood.

The discrepancies illustrated by the Opportunity Atlas tool help to shed light on how different neighborhoods shape the development of human capital and support economic growth.²³ A rigorous study found that the longer a child lived in a lower-poverty environment (defined as having a poverty rate below 10%) during childhood, the higher their chance to have better long-term outcomes.²⁴ By moving families to a high mobility neighborhood that has a low poverty rate, more stable family structures, greater social capital, and better school quality, children from those families can make income gains in adulthood. The research suggests the need for a holistic approach to reduce racial disparities and improve upward mobility for all.

Economic mobility outcomes by income

The maps below show economic mobility as the future incomes for children from low-income families, with red indicating lower future earnings while blue shows higher earnings. Across the country this map shows that economic mobility for children of low-income parents is lowest in the southeastern region of the U.S. and highest in the northern region.

In Harris County, for example, the average child born between 1978 and 1983 from a low-income family (defined as families at the 25th percentile of household income) earns a household income of $33,000 at age 35. A low-income child of the same birth cohort in Fort Bend County earns $35,000 a year, and in Montgomery County earns $36,000 a year. In all three cases, the average child barely improves upon the income of the household in which they grew up.

Within each county, one’s childhood ZIP code can tell a great deal about expected outcomes. On average, a child from a low-income family raised in Bellaire, a high-income community in Southwest Harris County, surrounded by a peer group from a higher-income bracket has a much greater chance of earning a higher household income (over $40,000) than a low-income child raised in Fifth Ward ($23,000), a low-income community just north of downtown Houston. Similarly, a child from a low-income family who grew up in New Caney, between I-45 and I-59 in Northeast Harris County, earns a household income of $33,000 as an adult, compared to a low-income child from The Woodlands, a wealthy township in south Montgomery County, making around $50,000.

A child from a low-income family, defined as families in the 25^th percentile of household income, raised in Greater Third Ward, a high-poverty area just south of downtown Houston, and a child raised in North Forest, a low-income community in Northeast Houston between 610 and beltway 8 loops, have equal chances of earning a household income of $20,000 in adulthood

Household income at age 35 for children of low-income parents by neighborhood/census tract where they grew up in Harris County.

Household income at age 35 for children of low-income parents by neighborhood/census tract where they grew up in Fort Bend County.

Household income at age 35 for children of low-income parents by neighborhood/census tract where they grew up in Montgomery County.

Economic mobility trends by income

This Mobility Outcomes map created by Opportunity Insights allows us to explore how economic mobility across the nation differs by place, race, gender, and class. In the summer of 2024, Opportunity Insights built upon this initial research and created the Mobility Trends map, which allows us to see how economic mobility is, or isn’t, improving over time and for whom.

On the left, the Mobility Outcomes map shows economic mobility as the future incomes for children from low-income families, with red indicating lower future earnings while blue shows higher earnings. Across the country this map shows that economic mobility for children of low-income parents is lowest in the southeastern region of the U.S. and highest in the northern region.

On the right, the Mobility Trends map, building on the Mobility Outcomes map, shows changes in economic mobility on the county-level by comparing income differences, over time, of adults born into similar places and circumstances.  Like the Mobility Outcomes map, areas that show the greatest improvements in economic mobility are shaded in blue while places with deteriorating economic mobility are shaded in red.

Are the future incomes of children born into low-income families in 1992 higher than the future incomes of similar children born in 1978? It depends. Nationally, the future income of children from low-income (25^th percentile) families born in 1992 is 4.2% lower than similar children born in 1978. This is compared to it being stagnant for children born to high-income (75^th percentile) parents suggesting increasing class gaps at the national level.

In our three-county region, the change in economic mobility (the difference in adult earnings between those born in 1992 and those born in 1978) stagnated for children born to low-income and children born to high-income parents.

However, comparing changes in economic mobility for children born to the lowest-income (1^st percentile) and highest-income (100^th percentile) parents tells a much different story.

Economic mobility for children born to the lowest-income parents has increased by 2% in Montgomery County while it has not changed in Fort Bend and Harris counties. For children born to the highest-income parents, there was an increase of 6.1% in Fort Bend County, 6.7% in Harris County, and 4% in Montgomery County, pointing to an increasing income gap across our region between children born to the lowest- and highest-income households.

Economic mobility outcomes by race

Economic mobility can affect subgroups in the same neighborhood in different ways, shedding light on some racial and class-based disparities. For example, the average Black child from a low-income family in Fort Bend County earns a household income of $27,000 in adulthood, compared to $44,000 for the average white child from a low-income family. Similarly, a Black child from a low-income family raised in Montgomery County earns a household income of $25,000, compared to a white child from a low-income family making $39,000.

This dataset has also shown downward mobility varies by race. Black boys who grow up in America, even from an affluent family and live in a high-income neighborhood, still earn less in adulthood than white boys with similar backgrounds.²⁵ Moreover, white boys from affluent families are more likely to stay wealthy in adulthood while Black boys from similar families are more likely to become poor rather than retain their socioeconomic status as adults. 

Economic mobility trends by race

The newest addition to Opportunity Atlas—the Mobility Trends map—shows that while racial disparities in economic mobility still exist, they have shrunk over time while gaps by income level have widened. This study reveals that the national income gap between white children from low-income (25^th percentile) and high-income (75^th percentile) households has widened by 30%, while the earnings gap between white and Black children from low-income households has shrunk by the same amount.

However, white children from low-income families still earn, on average, $13,000 more in adulthood than Black children in similar situations. Additionally, the Black-white economic mobility gap narrowed mainly due to improvements in Black children’s chances of moving out of poverty, not their likelihood of reaching the upper class. Black children born into the lowest income quintile in 1978 were 15 times more likely to remain there compared to white children—this gap decreased by 4.1 percentage points for those born in 1992. However, the likelihood of a Black or white child born into a low-income family reaching the top income quintile has not changed.

Our three-county region mirrors national trends with the income gap between white children born to low-income and high-income parents widening by 36% in Fort Bend County, 30% in Harris County, and 18% in Montgomery County. Similarly, the income gap between white and black children from low-income families has decreased by 42% in Fort Bend County, 35% in Harris County, and 31% in Montgomery County. However, disparities persist with a future earnings gap of $7,500 between white and Black children born into low-income families in 1992 in Fort Bend County and a gap of $8,200 in Harris and Montgomery counties.

Helpful Articles from Understanding Houston

• A Closer Look at Financial Hardship in the Houston Region
• Is Houston really that affordable?

Unemployment and Jobs in Houston

Strong job and industry growth are essential to increasing economic opportunity and security for all Houstonians

Houston’s three-county region continues to have strong jobs and industry growth over the last decade.

The data

Houston-area unemployment rates hold steady from 2022 to 2023

The unemployment rate measures the share of workers in the labor force who do not currently have a job but are actively looking for work. The level of unemployment is a general measure of how the overall economy is operating, and changes in the rate can be an important signal of changes in the labor market and economy.

During the Great Recession in 2010, unemployment rates in Fort Bend and Montgomery counties were at a 30-year high but steadily declined to a two-decade low in 2019. Of course, unemployment rates spiked in 2020 — the result of pandemic-related job losses. However, between 2020 and 2022, unemployment rates declined significantly returning to pre-pandemic levels and have remained flat since then. In 2023, the unemployment rate in Harris County (4.3%) was highest in Houston’s three-county region, while the unemployment rate was 4.0% in Fort Bend and 3.9 in Montgomery counties.

Job growth in Houston’s three-county region is positive but slower from 2022

Job growth is a key indicator of economic expansion and a strong job market. As a leading economic indicator, robust job growth typically signals a healthy economy.

The COVID-19 pandemic severely affected job availability with all three counties, the state, and the nation experiencing the greatest decline in jobs in 2020 than in at least the last decade. Recovery began in 2021, and by 2022, job growth reached its highest levels in years. However, between 2022 and 2023, job growth stagnated or declined with Fort Bend County experiencing the sharpest decline in job growth decreasing by eight percentage points.

Even so, Fort Bend and Montgomery counties continued to experience strong job growth between 2022 and 2023 at about 5% outpacing job growth across Texas (3%) and the U.S. (2%).  Looking at trends over a longer period of time between 2010 and 2023, job growth in Fort Bend (88%), Montgomery County (77%), and Harris County (21%) outpaced the nation overall (19%).

Industries in Houston see steady, consistent growth

Texas and Houston’s three-county area continue to be a place of business opportunity and growth. According to the Greater Houston Partnership, which provides economic data and analysis for the nine-county Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land Metropolitan Statistical Area (Houston MSA), found that the region ranks third in the number of  Fortune 500 headquarters, and Texas has ranked the best state for business for 19 years in 2023.

Between 2010 and 2023, Houston’s three-county region saw the greatest growth in businesses in the following industries: education and health services,leisure and hospitality, and professional and business services. Growth in Houston-area businesses has occurred in each of the three counties, with Fort Bend and Montgomery counties experiencing the fastest businesses growth — mirroring their rapid population growth. While it may appear that Harris County business growth has slowed, the lower growth rates are more a reflection of a large, existing set of businesses already in Harris County, and so while growth continues for the county, its relative growth is smaller compared to its rapidly growing neighbors. 

Fort Bend County has doubled the number of business establishments between 2010 and 2023, with the greatest growth in professional and business services (136% increase), followed closely by information (132% increase) and education and health services (130% increase), and then leisure and hospitality (113% increase).

In Harris County, the number of establishments increased by 25% from 2010 to 2023 — a slower growth rate given the volume in the third most populous county in the nation. Among the largest three industries, establishments in education and health services grew the most (61% increase), followed by leisure and hospitality (44%), and professional and business services (34%).

The number of establishments in Montgomery County grew by 75% between 2010 and 2023. Among the largest three industries, establishments in education and health services grew the most (115%), followed by information (104%), and professional and business services (94%).

The top Houston-area job is in office and administrative support

The type of work people do, or occupational mix, is important to understanding the economy of a region. Changes in occupation often reflect business innovations. When a business adopts new technology, produces new products, or makes other changes to its processes, doing so usually causes changes in occupational mix. For example, if a factory automates, the number of production workers usually declines, while the number of engineers increases.²

There have been five major shifts in the occupational mix in U.S. history: the decline of agricultural employment (1870 to 1970), the rise of office work (1870 to 1970), the decline of manual labor (1940 to 1970), the decline of production work (1950 to 2010), and the rise of management (1970 to 2005).³

The top Houston-area job in each county is in office and administrative support, and while the counties share commonalities in occupational mix, there are notable differences. In Fort Bend County, most people are employed as office and administrative support (12%), educational instruction (10%), food prep and serving (10%), sales (10%) and transportation/warehouse (10%). In Harris County, most residents are employed as office and administrative support (12%) and transportation/warehouse (10%), reflecting the significance of trade in Houston — which is a major distribution center for the nation and globe, as the port of Houston is the top foreign trading port in the U.S. by weight. In Montgomery County, most workers are employed as office and administrative support (13%), food prep and serving (11%), and sales (10%).

More than half of Houston-area jobs pay more than $40,000 annually

Availability of jobs is crucial, but it is equally important that those jobs offer fair and livable wages. The Census categorizes jobs as low-wage (i.e., jobs that pay $15,000 or less annually), medium-wage, and high-wage, with “high-wage” jobs being any work that earns more than $40,000 annually. An individual earning more than $40,000 annually is living above the Federal Poverty Line, however, they are not earning enough to make ends meet given the line’s rudimentary determination.

Based on the Census definition, 58% of jobs in the three-county area are classified as “high-wage” positions, in that they pay more than $40,000 annually. When comparing across the three-counties, Harris County has the largest percentage of residents working in a high-wage job (59%) compared to Fort Bend County (47%) and Montgomery County (53%). Between 2005 and 2022, the number of “high-wage” jobs increased 211% in Fort Bend, 106% in Harris, and 328% in Montgomery counties and 119% in Texas overall.

About 16% of the three-county area residents are in low-wage jobs ($15,000 or less annually). About 21% of workers in Fort Bend County, 18% in Montgomery County, and 15% in Harris County are in low-wage jobs. This means that 1 in 6 workers in the region work at least 40 hours a week, yet bring home less than $1,250 a month.

Income and Inequality in Houston

While the overall Houston region is rich in economic prosperity, persistent income inequalities signal many residents of color have not benefited

Incomes in the Houston region have barely increased over the last decade, yet disparities across race/ethnicity have persisted.

The data

Household incomes in the Houston area remain sluggish yet disparities persist

Household income measures a family’s ability to meet their basic needs, and includes earnings for each household member, income from social security, interest, dividends, and other sources. Median household income is the the level at which half of households earn more and half of households earn less.

In 2023, the median household income (in 2023 dollars) was $105,441 in Fort Bend County (the highest in Houston’s three-county region), $91,841 in Montgomery County, and $72,336 in Harris County. While median household income in Fort Bend and Montgomery counties is higher than in Texas and the U.S. overall, Harris County’s is about the same. 

Between 2010 and 2023, income growth in the Houston region significantly lagged behind that in the state and nation overall. Median household income remained relatively flat in Fort Bend and Montgomery counties but slightly grew by 3% in Harris County. This is a slower growth rate compared to the state (12% increase) and nation (11% increase) during the same period.

Consistent with patterns seen in communities across the country, median household income in the Houston area varies significantly by racial/ethnic group. Racial discrimination in many forms, including in education, hiring, pay practices, and homeownership contributes to persistent earnings gaps.^{2 3}

As of 2023, the racial/ethnic wage gap continues to persist throughout the Houston region, consistent with trends at the state and national level. In 2023, white households in Fort Bend County earned 32% more than Black households and 46% more than Hispanic households — this is an improvement from 2010 when white households earned 63% and 85% more than Black and Hispanic households, respectively.

The Black-white income gap in Harris County has not improved much in the last decade. In 2023, white households in Harris County earned 96% more than Black households compared to 2010 when the gap was 101%. In 2023, white households in Harris County earned 60% more than Hispanic households, which is an improvement from 2010 when white households earned 83% more.

Income disparities in Montgomery County appear to have shrunk in the last decade.⁴ In 2023, white households in Montgomery County earned 29% more than Black households and 36% more than Hispanic households. This is a significant improvement from 2010 when white households earned 84% and 65% more than Black and Hispanic households, respectively.

Wealth disparities still persist and have worsened since 1963

Wealth includes all of a person’s or family’s assets including a home, savings, stocks, property and income. These assets can help families endure economic shocks like layoffs, natural disasters, or health emergencies.⁵ Homeownership stands as the primary means of accumulating wealth, but disparities persist in homeownership rates along racial and ethnic lines. Further, some populations tend to receive a lower return-on-investment in college and in incomes compared to the white population, meaning Black and Hispanic families are less able to turn each dollar of income or amount of education into wealth as white families.⁶

Data between 1963 and 2019 from the Survey of Consumer Finances shows how the distribution of wealth in the United States has become more unequal:

• Families in the bottom 1% are roughly $100,000 in debt (negative wealth), being 15x more in debt than in 1963.
• Families in the bottom 10% are roughly $500 in debt (negative wealth).
• Families at the 90^th percentile have seen their wealth grow 5.4 times from 1963 ($238,860) to 2019 ($1,291,982).
• Families in the top 1% of earners have seen their wealth multiplied by 8 times from 1963 ($1,457,201) to 2019 ($11,762,462).

Wealth cannot be calculated for the Houston area due to data limitations. As a result, the subsequent analysis focuses on income and earnings and how they are unequally distributed among people in the Houston area.

In 2023, similar to the state and national levels, the top 20% of households in Harris County received 53.2% of the income, while the bottom 20% of households received only 2.9%. Similar patterns can be found in Fort Bend and Montgomery counties, where the top 20% of households received 47.8% and 49.6% of total income, respectively, while the bottom 20% of households received 3.6% and 3.7% of the income, respectively.

Gender and racial/ethnic pay gaps barely budge

Despite growing median income and employment, pay inequalities by race and gender in Houston’s three-county region continue. It’s important to note that this data does not look specifically at men and women with the same jobs or qualifications, however research has shown that gender pay disparities persist within occupations — with men making more, on average, than women,⁷ and even as women enter male-dominated fields, the overall pay actually begins to fall. Research also shows that women are less likely to hold or grow into higher-level, high-paying jobs compared to men, which affects this gender gap.⁸

One way to measure this disparity is to use the female-to-male earnings ratio, which represents the earnings of women compared to the earnings of men measured by cents on the dollar. The higher the earnings ratio, the smaller the pay gap.

In 2023, across the nation and state, women earned 82 cents for every dollar men were paid. In 2023, for every $1 earned by men, women earned 79 cents in Fort Bend County, 84 cents in Harris County, and 77 cents in Montgomery County.

From 2010 to 2023, the gender pay gap improved the most in Fort Bend County going from 0.70 in 2010 to 0.79 in 2023. This gap remained unchanged in Harris County between 2010 and 2023 and worsened by two cents in Montgomery County.

Earnings ratio by race ethnicity

The racial and ethnic earnings ratio measures median earnings for people who identify as Black, Indigenous, Latino, or Asian American relative to the earnings of white residents. In the U.S., gaps between white workers and Black and Hispanic workers have persisted since 1970.

In each Houston-area county, Asian American, Black, and Hispanic workers earn less relative to their white counterparts, except Asian-American workers in Fort Bend County who earn more. Between 2010 and 2023, this gap has decreased for each of the racial groups across all three counties.

Gender earnings ratio by race/ethnicity

Belonging to a certain race or age group does not protect women from experiencing gender pay disparities. This disadvantage affects women at every education, occupation, and age group, though higher-earning women and mid-career women are at a greater disadvantage compared to their male counterparts. And relative to white male wages, Black and Hispanic women are the most disadvantaged.⁹

In Fort Bend and Harris counties, white women experience the greatest gender pay gap, earning the least relative to each dollar a white man makes; whereas Black women consistently have the lowest gender pay gap compared to their male counterparts. This is most likely because the average white man earns so much, while the pay for the average Black man is significantly lower, by comparison. In Montgomery County, Asian women experience the greatest gender pay gap.

Unlike the racial/ethnic pay gap, the gender pay gap by race and ethnicity has not improved across the board. Across the four largest racial groups in all three counties, the state, and the nation, the gender pay gap has improved the most for Asian American women, compared to Asian American men, in Harris County decreasing by 11 cents while it has widened the most for Asian-American women in Montgomery County widening by 31 cents.

Helpful Articles by Understanding Houston:

• A Closer Look at Financial Hardship in the Houston Region
• The Great She-cession: How COVID-19 is impacting women in the workforce
• Is Houston really that affordable?